Y’know what I love? Devoting several hundred words to defending somebody, then watching that person turn around and do something stupid. But sadly, that’s exactly what just happened with Sarah Palin. Via the Other McCain, she has endorsed Rand Paul in Kentucky’s GOP primary for the 2010 Senate race.
Yeah, the son of that guy. Rand may not come across as droolingly-insane as Daddy Dumbest, and in fact is a little more hawkish (he supports Afghanistan), but his foreign policy judgment is still foolish and simplistic, including opposition to the Iraq War and paranoia over the military-industrial complex.
(For what it’s worth, there’s a website dedicated to tearing down Rand as “Too Kooky for Kentucky.” Not having followed the race until now, I can’t vouch for its substance, and I have to admit that I get a LGF-esque “guilt-by-association” vibe from some of their stuff, but there it is.)
What does Palin think of the fact that Rand’s foreign policy views differ from her own? Does this mean victory in Iraq isn’t as big a priority for her after all? Is she at all concerned about giving mainstream credibility, however indirect, to Rand’s deranged father? What is so important about this race that it’s worth the PR headaches of associating yourself with the nuts of the party?
If it’s merely because Rand’s an “outsider” like she is, then maybe, just maybe, liberals are more right about her intellect than any of us would like to admit…